In 2025, people are comparing Grokipedia vs Wikipedia more than ever. Wikipedia has been the main online encyclopedia for over 20 years, while Elon Musk's new project, Grokipedia, uses artificial intelligence to create and share information in a new way. Both websites store large amounts of knowledge, but they work very differently.
This guide explains how Grokipedia and Wikipedia started, what their goals are, and what makes them different. It will help you decide which one is better for your needs.
What Is Grokipedia?
Grokipedia is an online encyclopedia made by Elon Musk's company, xAI. It is connected with the Grok AI chatbot, which is available for premium users on X (previously called Twitter). Grokipedia was launched in beta on October 27, 2025, under the version name Grokipedia 0.1.
It quickly became popular because it promises to share "truth-seeking" content made by AI, not humans. Within days, Grokipedia had around 900,000 articles, many taken from Wikipedia under Creative Commons rules. Users can't edit articles directly. Instead, they can send feedback or suggestions, which are reviewed by xAI moderators.
According to Musk, this helps reduce fake information and bias. But some users have found errors or one-sided opinions in certain articles, raising questions about how fair AI-written content really is.
What Is Wikipedia?
Wikipedia was created in 2001 by Jimmy Wales and Larry Sanger. It is a free encyclopedia run by the Wikimedia Foundation, a nonprofit group. Millions of people from around the world write and edit its articles. With over 7 million English articles and many more in other languages, it covers nearly every topic imaginable.
Anyone can edit Wikipedia, but editors must follow rules about neutrality, reliable sources, and proper citations. This open approach makes Wikipedia detailed and trustworthy, but sometimes it faces problems like vandalism or "edit wars."
Main Differences Between Grokipedia and Wikipedia
Both websites aim to share free knowledge, but they differ in how they create, manage, and update content.
Grokipedia
- AI writes and checks articles automatically
- Users can suggest corrections but cannot edit directly
- Updates faster but limits community participation
- Focuses on speed and AI efficiency
Wikipedia
- People around the world write and edit articles together
- Changes are reviewed by other editors
- Keeps content reliable but slower to update
- Values accuracy and teamwork
Governance and Ownership
- Wikipedia: Run by a nonprofit (Wikimedia Foundation), which keeps it open and ad-free.
- Grokipedia: Owned by xAI, a private company led by Elon Musk. All decisions are made centrally.
This shows their main difference: one is public and open, the other is private and AI-driven.
Reliability and Bias
- Grokipedia: Uses AI to check facts, but it can copy biases from its data sources.
- Wikipedia: Sometimes has human bias, but its open logs make it easy to track and fix errors.
Result: Wikipedia is more transparent, while Grokipedia depends on how well its AI is trained.
Licensing and Openness
- Wikipedia: All content is under Creative Commons, so anyone can reuse it with credit.
- Grokipedia: Some content follows these rules, but not all. Its source code is still private.
Wikipedia is more open for researchers and developers.
Size and Coverage
- Wikipedia: Has over 7 million English articles in 300+ languages.
- Grokipedia: About 885,000 articles in beta, growing fast but still smaller.
Update Speed and Style
- Grokipedia: Updates in real time using AI, often with a fun or casual tone.
- Wikipedia: Updates more slowly but keeps a formal, academic tone.
Comparison Table: Grokipedia vs Wikipedia (2025)
| Aspect | Grokipedia Pros | Grokipedia Cons | Wikipedia Pros | Wikipedia Cons |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Content | Fast, AI-made | Can make mistakes | Checked by people | Updates slower |
| Editing | Easy to suggest fixes | No direct control | Open to all editors | Possible edit wars |
| Bias | Aims to reduce bias | Can copy AI bias | Clear rules for neutrality | Human opinions differ |
| Size | Growing fast | Smaller library | Huge global database | Hard to browse all |
| Transparency | AI checks data | No public edits | Open edit history | Can be vandalized |
How to Use Grokipedia
- Go to grokipedia.com.
- Type your topic in the search box.
- Read the AI-created article with facts and summaries.
- Use the feedback option to suggest corrections.
- Always double-check facts using other sources like Wikipedia or Google Scholar.
Which One Should You Use?
It depends on what you want:
- For quick, AI-written summaries, use Grokipedia.
- For detailed, fact-checked information, use Wikipedia.
The best choice is to use both: Grokipedia for speed and Wikipedia for trust and accuracy.
Conclusion: The Future of Knowledge
Elon Musk's Grokipedia shows how AI can change the way we find and share knowledge. It is fast and modern, but still new and learning. Wikipedia, built by millions of people over 20 years, remains the most trusted community encyclopedia. In 2025, Grokipedia is a helpful addition—not a replacement—for Wikipedia. The future will likely combine AI's power with human wisdom to make knowledge better for everyone.